Over the centuries, the human race has created many words to explain the Divine Force of the universe. Many use the word "God". Still others use words like Universal Mind, Tao, Yin, Logos and many others. Almost every religion and spiritual group uses some word to call out the Divine Force. On a more scientific level, we also have a word that describes this Divine Force… the Field (or Zero Point Field).
Regardless of religious or spiritual preferences, most people are seeking some form of higher wisdom, understanding, consciousness, intelligence and ultimately enlightenment. Words like "God" are used to call out the Divine Force or "Divine Vibration" that is mentioned in almost all religions. This "vibration" is within everything and sustains the entire universe. No matter what word sounds most appealing to you, the meaning is virtually the same across belief systems and fits into the more scientific term… the Field.
The Field, much like the "Divine Vibration", is a vast energy sea that connects everything in the universe including our minds. As explained in the book "The Field" by Lynne McTaggart, the Field is a unifying concept of the universe, one that reconciles mind with matter, classic Newtonian science with quantum physics and science with religion.
The Zero Point Field is described as microscopic vibrations in outer space as well as within and between physical objects on Earth and throughout the universe. This "cobweb of energy exchange" links everything in the universe including our minds.
Physicists have been aware of the Field for years. However, constrained by orthodoxy, they have ignored its effects which Lynne McTaggart likens to "subtracting out God" from their equations.
The concept or question that I pose to all of you is…
What if "God" (the Divine Force / Vibration that is innately felt by almost all of us on some level) is the sum of all universal consciousness connected through the Field?
I welcome and look forward to all concepts, theories and comments regarding this question.
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This